Labour Rights Index
What does the law promise a worker?
The Labour Rights Index compares legal protections across the working life, from fair wages and safe work to care responsibilities and the freedom to organise. Explore the rights behind the score and the gaps that can guide change.
Produced by WageIndicator Foundation and the Centre for Labour Research.
Labour rights around the world
Hover over a country for its overall score, or choose one to see its result on each of the ten indicators.
Explore Labour Rights Index 2026
2026 overall score
- 0–50Total lack of access to decent work
- 50.5–60Basic access to decent work
- 60.5–70Limited access to decent work
- 70.5–80Reasonable access to decent work
- 80.5–90Approaching access to decent work
- 90.5–100Access to decent work
Grey: not covered in the 2026 Index
Score by indicator
- Fair Wages
- Decent Working Time
- Employment Security
- Family Responsibilities
- Maternity Protection
- Safe Work
- Social Security
- Equal Opportunity and Treatment
- Child Labour and Forced Labour
- Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
A change since 2024 may come from a change in the law, a methodology change (a revised question, benchmark or coding rule), newly located or corrected legal evidence, or the correction of an earlier coding error.
Note: The Labour Rights Index scores countries on applicable labour and social security laws only. It does not measure actual working conditions or compliance with the law in workplaces. Scores should be read alongside data on labour inspection capacity, the rule of law, informal employment, trade union density, collective bargaining coverage, social protection coverage and the gender wage gap, which indicate how far legal protections reach workers in practice.
WageIndicator Foundation and Centre for Labour Research, Labour Rights Index 2026. Map shapes: Natural Earth.What the 2026 Index shows
Key findings from the 2026 edition across 168 countries, from the scores and the report’s analysis.
Countries by rating
For each rating, its share of the 168 countries and its share of the people living in them.
Each bar is drawn out of 100%. Share of people living in the 168 countries covered, not the whole world.
Room for reform
Average score by indicator, out of 100, lowest first.
The 2026 edition measures 48 components in 168 countries, up from 46 in 145. Lower averages for Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining and for Child Labour and Forced Labour mainly reflect stricter benchmarks, not only changes in the law.
Scores by region
Average overall score, with the highest-scoring country.
Europe covers the 27 EU member states, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Three findings from the report
-
68countries score 0 on forced labour
The ban is usually already there
Most countries prohibit forced labour. The gaps sit elsewhere in the law: prison work for private companies, prison sentences with compulsory labour for peaceful strikes, shipping discipline, or national service beyond military work. 56 countries that met the earlier benchmark do not meet the stricter 2026 one.
-
142 of 168have a legal route to classify platform workers by the facts
From contract labels to working reality
The platform contract no longer decides a worker’s status on its own: courts and laws look at how the work is actually organised. ILO Convention No. 193, adopted on 12 June 2026, now requires correct classification of platform workers, guided mainly by the facts.
-
A legal floor for human rights due diligence
A high score shows that a legal baseline exists, not that there is no risk. A low score is the stronger signal: the legal floor cannot be relied on, so a company’s own due diligence and grievance mechanisms must carry more weight.
New in 2026
Three new components, revised rules for probation, forced labour and platform work, and 23 more countries in scope.
From 46 to 48 components
Three components added; two maternity-benefit questions combined. Rules also change for probation, forced-labour remedies and platform workers’ status.
-
Childcare Services
A new test of legally established childcare services.
Added to indicator: Family Responsibilities
-
Right to Leave or Refuse Dangerous Work
A new test of the right to leave serious danger without retaliation.
Added to indicator: Safe Work
-
Social Dialogue
A new test of consultation with workers and employers before labour-policy decisions.
Added to indicator: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
Score changes can reflect legal reforms, revised rules or corrected evidence, not only changes in protection.
168 countries. A common framework.
Coverage has grown with each edition. In 2026, the Index adds countries and economies across five geographic groups.
- 2020 115 countries
- 2022 135 countries
- 2024 145 countries
- 2026 168 countries
The 23 additions in 2026
Africa 6
- Eritrea
- Equatorial Guinea
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mauritius
- Seychelles
- Somalia
Americas 5
- Guyana
- Jamaica
- Panama
- Suriname
- Uruguay
Asia 5
- Bhutan
- Hong Kong
- Maldives
- North Korea
- Turkmenistan
Europe 4
- Armenia
- Kosovo
- Liechtenstein
- Switzerland
Oceania 3
- Fiji
- Solomon Islands
- Vanuatu
How the law is changing
Seven of the largest reforms of this cycle, and what each change did to the score.
Between 1 January 2024 and 1 January 2026, the Index recorded 134 legal changes in 70 countries. 70 of them changed a component score; the other 64 improved or weakened the law without changing a score.
- Score rose from 0 to 1
- Score fell from 1 to 0
- Law improved, score unchanged
- Law weakened, score unchanged
Lesotho
Mixed changesA new Labour Act, with one step back
The 2024 Labour Act raises six component scores. Its averaging rules, however, let weekly hours exceed the Index’s 56-hour benchmark.
Reforms moved the overall score by +10 pointsShow all 7 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Fair Wages Night work pays at least 125% of the normal rate.
- Score fell from 1 to 0: Decent Working Time Monthly averaging lets weekly hours exceed 56.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Family Responsibilities 14 days of paid paternity leave, where there was none.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection Maternity leave rises from 12 to 14 weeks.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection Pregnancy becomes a prohibited ground of discrimination.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment A broad harassment framework, covering colleagues, clients and other third parties.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment The ban on women working in underground mining is removed.
Angola
Expanded protectionA new General Labour Law
Law No. 12/23 took effect on 26 March 2024, replacing the 2015 law. A statutory invalidity benefit followed in 2025.
Reforms moved the overall score by +10 pointsShow all 8 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Fair Wages Night work carries a 20% premium.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Employment Security Fixed-term contracts are capped by the reason for hiring, from 6 to 60 months.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Employment Security One severance formula applies to all employers.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection Employers may not require a pregnancy test from job candidates.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Social Security A statutory invalidity benefit scheme, introduced in 2025.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Fair Wages One overtime premium for all employers: 50% for the first 30 hours a month, 75% after that.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Sexual harassment, already a crime, is now expressly misconduct under labour law.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Family Responsibilities 1 paid day of paternity leave, plus 7 unpaid days: below the 7-paid-day benchmark.
Kyrgyz Republic
Expanded protectionA new Labour Code in 2025
The 2025 Labour Code strengthens equality at work and the place of trade unions in collective bargaining.
Reforms moved the overall score by +6 pointsShow all 3 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Equal pay for work of equal value, not only for equal work.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Restrictions on women’s work are narrowed to pregnant and breastfeeding workers.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Other worker representatives may bargain only where no trade union exists.
Colombia
Expanded protectionA shorter working week
A 2021 law has cut normal weekly hours in stages. A 2025 reform caps fixed-term contracts and gives workers with care responsibilities the right to request flexible work.
Reforms moved the overall score by +6 pointsShow all 6 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Decent Working Time Normal weekly hours fall to 44, with a 56-hour maximum including overtime, since July 2025.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Employment Security Fixed-term contracts, including renewals, are capped at four years, where there was no limit.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Family Responsibilities Workers with family care responsibilities may request flexible working.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Fair Wages Night work now starts at 7 p.m. instead of 9 p.m.; the 35% premium is unchanged.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Fair Wages The premium for work on the weekly rest day rises from 75% to 80%, then to 90% in 2026 and 100% in 2027.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Law No. 2365 of 2024 defines workplace sexual harassment and requires employers to prevent it.
Egypt
Mixed changesMore protection, but no overtime ceiling
Labour Law No. 14 of 2025 extends maternity leave and adds equality protections. It also replaces the daily limit on actual working time with a limit on time spent at the workplace.
Reforms moved the overall score by +4 pointsShow all 5 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection Maternity leave rises from 90 to 120 days.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Equal pay for work of equal value, across all parts of pay.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Discrimination is prohibited on 12 grounds.
- Score fell from 1 to 0: Decent Working Time A 12-hour daily limit on presence at work, with no weekly, monthly or annual overtime limit.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Family Responsibilities 1 day of paternity leave: below the 7-day benchmark.
India
Mixed changesFour Labour Codes take effect
The Codes came into force on 21 November 2025. In Uttar Pradesh, the jurisdiction used where labour law varies within India, a state amendment lengthens the overtime limit.
Reforms moved the overall score by +4 pointsShow all 4 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Employment Security Every employee must receive a letter of appointment.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection Health safeguards for pregnant and nursing workers.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Equal Opportunity and Treatment Women may work in all establishments and, with their consent, at night.
- Score fell from 1 to 0: Decent Working Time The overtime limit in Uttar Pradesh rises from 75 to 144 hours a quarter.
Saudi Arabia
Mixed changesMaternity pay moves to social insurance
The 2024 Social Insurance Law pays the maternity benefit through the General Organisation for Social Insurance instead of the employer. A 2024 amendment also changes maternity leave and probation.
Reforms moved the overall score by +4 pointsShow all 6 changesHide the changes
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Maternity Protection A maternity benefit of 100% of average earnings, paid by social insurance.
- Score rose from 0 to 1: Fair Wages The minimum wage was revised on 21 November 2024. It is a threshold for counting Saudi nationals, not a wage floor for all workers.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Fair Wages With the worker’s consent, paid compensatory leave may replace overtime pay.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Employment Security Termination notice for monthly-paid workers falls from 60 to 30 days, still within the benchmark.
- Law improved, score unchanged: Maternity Protection Maternity leave rises from 10 to 12 weeks, still below the 14-week benchmark.
- Law weakened, score unchanged: Employment Security Probation of up to 180 days is now allowed in every case.
A reform that changes one component moves the overall score by 2 points, or 2.5 in Safe Work and in Child Labour and Forced Labour, which have four components each. These examples describe changes in legal protection. They do not establish how effectively a law is enforced, or a country’s overall score.
What the Index measures
Ten indicators, 48 legal questions. Open an area to see what earns a positive score, the thresholds used and the qualifications that matter.
These are readable summaries of the Labour Rights Index 2026 methodology. Each component receives 1 when its requirements are met and 0 otherwise, with no partial credit. The Index assesses law, not enforcement; the standard reference case and dates apply throughout. How scoring and the reference case work.
-
Fair Wages
Pay floors and the rules that govern when and how workers are paid.
5 components
- Minimum Wage
- Regular Wage
- Overtime Premium
- Weekly Rest Work Compensation
- Night Work Premium
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Fair Wages
Fair Wages: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
1.1
Minimum Wage
Scores 1 whenA binding minimum wage applies and its rate has been revised within the 24 months before the reference date.
Key qualificationsA statutory rate, wage-setting order or binding national or sectoral agreement can qualify. An outdated rate does not. The 24-month interval is an LRI benchmark.
-
1.2
Regular Wage
Scores 1 whenThe law sets an enforceable pay interval and payment deadline, including any bounded grace period.
Key qualificationsHourly, daily, weekly, fortnightly or monthly arrangements can qualify. Timing left entirely to the employer does not.
-
1.3
Overtime Premium
Scores 1 whenOvertime attracts a monetary payment of at least 125% of the ordinary hourly rate.
Key qualificationsA graduated rate can qualify if every hour beyond 48 in a week attracts at least 125%. Time off alone, without extra cash payment, does not.
-
1.4
Weekly Rest Work Compensation
Scores 1 whenWork on the weekly rest day must be followed by equivalent compensatory rest.
Key qualificationsAn additional cash premium is allowed, and the timing of rest may be agreed. Cash alone, or an option to waive the replacement rest, does not qualify.
-
1.5
Night Work Premium
Scores 1 whenNight work attracts a mandatory premium, allowance or reduction in working hours.
Key qualificationsThe rule must establish a binding minimum entitlement. No specific percentage premium is required, but benefits left solely to employer or individual discretion do not qualify.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 1. Back to the indicators
-
Decent Working Time
Limits on working time, with time to rest, take holidays and recover.
5 components
- Normal Weekly Working Hours
- Maximum Weekly Working Hours
- Weekly Rest Hours
- Paid Public Holidays
- Annual Leave
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Decent Working Time
Decent Working Time: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
2.1
Normal Weekly Working Hours
Scores 1 whenNormal working time is legally limited to 48 hours a week or less, excluding overtime.
Key qualificationsA legally defined averaging period may be used if the average stays within 48 hours. Narrow emergency exceptions and specified supervisory or management exclusions do not by themselves defeat the score.
-
2.2
Maximum Weekly Working Hours
Scores 1 whenTotal working time, including overtime, is capped at 56 hours a week, or averages no more than 56 over a legally bounded period of at most 52 weeks.
Key qualificationsDaily, monthly or annual caps qualify only if they guarantee this limit. Routine waivers or open-ended excess hours do not; narrow emergencies may be excepted. The 56-hour threshold is an LRI benchmark.
-
2.3
Weekly Rest Hours
Scores 1 whenWorkers are entitled to at least 24 consecutive hours of rest in every seven-day period.
Key qualificationsThe rest must be continuous and cannot be waived. Scattered hours off do not meet this requirement.
-
2.4
Paid Public Holidays
Scores 1 whenWorkers have a binding entitlement to paid public holidays.
Key qualificationsStatutory holidays, legally issued annual proclamations or binding collective agreements can qualify. Unpaid holidays, discretionary policies or public-sector-only coverage do not.
-
2.5
Annual Leave
Scores 1 whenAfter one year of service, workers are entitled to at least three working weeks of paid annual leave.
Key qualificationsThis means 15 days in a five-day week, 18 in a six-day week, or 21 calendar days. Progressive accrual can qualify; requiring more than a year to qualify cannot.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 2. Back to the indicators
-
Employment Security
Written terms and protection through probation, fixed-term work and dismissal.
5 components
- Written Employment Contracts
- Fixed Term Contracts
- Probation Period
- Termination Notice Period
- Severance Pay
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Employment Security
Employment Security: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
3.1
Written Employment Contracts
Scores 1 whenWorkers receive a contract or written statement of essential employment terms at or before starting work.
Key qualificationsEssential terms include the parties, job, start date, wages and hours, plus duration and notice where applicable. Legally valid, accessible electronic documents count.
-
3.2
Fixed Term Contracts
Scores 1 whenFixed-term employment, including renewals, is limited to five years in total.
Key qualificationsA rule converting the employment to an indefinite contract within that limit can provide equivalent protection. A limit on each contract alone is insufficient if renewals exceed the cumulative limit.
-
3.3
Probation Period
Scores 1 whenProbation for a skilled worker lasts no more than six months, including extensions or renewals.
Key qualificationsNo probation, or ordinary dismissal protection from the start, also qualifies. An extension beyond six months does not qualify even if a collective agreement permits it.
-
3.4
Termination Notice Period
Scores 1 whenThe notice rule balances both sides: 30 days for each; 30 days from the worker and longer from the employer; or 30 days from the employer and 14–30 days from the worker.
Key qualificationsWritten notice or pay in lieu is assessed for service up to five years; four weeks is treated as 30 days. Serious misconduct may be excepted. Longer is not automatically better: 45 days for both sides does not meet this rule.
-
3.5
Severance Pay
Scores 1 whenOrdinary employer-initiated dismissal or redundancy brings at least two weeks’ wages for each year of service.
Key qualificationsEquivalent statutory gratuity, end-of-service or separation-fund benefits can count. Unemployment benefits alone do not satisfy this entitlement. Resignation and serious misconduct are outside this test.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 3. Back to the indicators
-
Family Responsibilities
Time, flexibility and services to combine paid work with caring responsibilities.
5 components
- Parental Leave
- Paternity Leave
- Flexible Work Arrangements
- Paid Nursing Breaks
- Childcare Services
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Family Responsibilities
Family Responsibilities: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
4.1
Parental Leave
Scores 1 whenA separate, job-protected entitlement provides at least four months of parental leave per child, following birth or adoption.
Key qualificationsLeave may be paid or unpaid, shared or available to either parent; a legally defined mother-only parental entitlement may qualify. Maternity or paternity leave, and generic childcare or family-care leave, do not substitute for it.
-
4.2
Paternity Leave
Scores 1 whenA father or legally recognised second parent has at least seven calendar days of paid leave around the birth.
Key qualificationsA paid, reserved father’s quota within parental leave can count if usable at birth. A shared entitlement with no reserved quota does not.
-
4.3
Flexible Work Arrangements
Scores 1 whenWorkers with family responsibilities have an enforceable right to request or use flexible work, with reasonable consideration and protection against retaliation.
Key qualificationsAn employer may refuse for objective operational reasons. A general flexible-work right can qualify if it covers these workers; voluntary policies or the mere availability of part-time work do not.
-
4.4
Paid Nursing Breaks
Scores 1 whenNursing breaks or reduced daily hours count as paid working time until the child is at least six months old.
Key qualificationsFacilities alone do not qualify. The time must be an enforceable, paid entitlement, rather than discretionary or unpaid leave.
-
4.5
Childcare Services
Scores 1 whenA legal framework establishes centre-based childcare for children under three, through government provision, regulated private providers or employer obligations.
Key qualificationsA scheme for a wider age range qualifies if it includes children under three; childcare only from age three does not. An employer obligation must not depend on the presence or number of women employees. Informal arrangements, voluntary benefits or women-only thresholds do not qualify.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 4. Back to the indicators
-
Maternity Protection
Protection from recruitment through pregnancy, childbirth and return to work.
5 components
- Pregnancy Inquiry During Recruitment
- Maternity Leave
- Maternity Benefits
- Restrictions on Work (for Pregnant or Nursing Women)
- Dismissals During Pregnancy
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Maternity Protection
Maternity Protection: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
5.1
Pregnancy Inquiry During Recruitment
Scores 1 whenRecruitment rules prohibit pregnancy tests, certificates or inquiries, or clearly prohibit pregnancy and maternity discrimination when hiring.
Key qualificationsProtection must cover recruitment. A rule addressing only dismissal after hiring does not meet this component.
-
5.2
Maternity Leave
Scores 1 whenThe law provides at least 14 weeks of maternity leave.
Key qualificationsThis component assesses leave duration. Income replacement and protection from dismissal are assessed separately below.
-
5.3
Maternity Benefits
Scores 1 whenMaternity cash benefits replace at least two-thirds of previous or insured earnings through a mandatory pooled, social-insurance or publicly funded system.
Key qualificationsA flat-rate benefit must reach two-thirds of the minimum wage. Mixed funding and employer top-ups can qualify; sole individual-employer liability cannot. Medical benefits or a birth grant alone do not replace the required income support.
-
5.4
Restrictions on Work (for Pregnant or Nursing Women)
Scores 1 whenPregnant and breastfeeding workers have targeted protection from hazardous work through specific restrictions or a risk-based sequence of adjustments.
Key qualificationsThe sequence can involve removing risks, adapting work, a safe transfer without loss of pay, or paid leave if needed. General safety rules, unpaid leave alone or blanket restrictions on all women are insufficient.
-
5.5
Dismissals During Pregnancy
Scores 1 whenDismissal because of pregnancy, maternity, childbirth-related circumstances or nursing is prohibited throughout pregnancy and maternity leave.
Key qualificationsDismissal for genuinely unrelated, objective reasons may remain lawful. Protection only during leave, with no protection during pregnancy, does not qualify.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 5. Back to the indicators
-
Safe Work
Prevention, the right to leave dangerous work and protection after an injury.
4 components
- Free Personal Protective Equipment
- Training: Occupational Safety and Health
- Right to Leave or Refuse Dangerous Work
- Employment Injury Benefits
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Safe Work
Safe Work: scoring criteria
4 equally weighted components · 25 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
6.1
Free Personal Protective Equipment
Scores 1 whenEmployers must provide necessary personal protective equipment at no cost to workers.
Key qualificationsAn express free-equipment rule, or an equipment duty combined with a general no-cost safety rule, can qualify. A generic safe-work duty alone is insufficient.
-
6.2
Training: Occupational Safety and Health
Scores 1 whenEmployers must provide appropriate safety information, instruction and training free of charge.
Key qualificationsThe duty must cover workers’ relevant risks, including induction, new work or changed risks. Training only for managers or safety officers, or a state programme with no employer duty, is insufficient.
-
6.3
Right to Leave or Refuse Dangerous Work
Scores 1 whenA worker who reasonably believes there is imminent and serious danger may stop or leave the work without dismissal, discipline, loss of pay or retaliation.
Key qualificationsNotification may be required if it does not delay immediate removal from danger. Having to await permission or an inspection does not qualify.
-
6.4
Employment Injury Benefits
Scores 1 whenA legally established scheme covers both workplace accidents and occupational diseases, with medical care and relevant incapacity or survivor cash benefits.
Key qualificationsSocial insurance, compulsory insurance or public funding can qualify, including mixed systems. Sole uninsured employer liability cannot. This component measures entitlement and funding, not the benefit level.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 6. Back to the indicators
-
Social Security
Income protection during sickness, unemployment, disability and old age.
5 components
- Old-Age Benefits
- Survivors’ Benefits
- Unemployment Benefits
- Sickness Benefits (Duration)
- Invalidity Benefits
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Social Security
Social Security: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
7.1
Old-Age Benefits
Scores 1 whenWorkers have a legally enforceable old-age benefit entitlement through social insurance, public funding or a mandatory regulated fund.
Key qualificationsMeans-tested, universal and mandatory provident-fund arrangements can qualify. Discretionary payments or sole unpooled employer liability do not. The score does not assess benefit adequacy.
-
7.2
Survivors’ Benefits
Scores 1 whenEligible survivors have a legal benefit entitlement following the death of a worker or eligible pensioner, through a recognised funded scheme.
Key qualificationsInsurance, public funding or mandatory regulated funds can qualify. Sole employer liability cannot. This test concerns the existence of protection, not how generous it is.
-
7.3
Unemployment Benefits
Scores 1 whenAn involuntarily unemployed person who is capable of and available for work has an entitlement to periodic cash support.
Key qualificationsAn enforceable insurance, assistance or regulated income-support scheme can qualify. Severance pay or a lump sum alone cannot; benefit adequacy is not scored here.
-
7.4
Sickness Benefits (Duration)
Scores 1 whenSickness cash benefits are available for at least 26 weeks per case, through insurance, public funding or a mandatory pooled system.
Key qualificationsA short employer-paid initial period may count towards the total when combined with such a scheme. Employer-only sick pay is insufficient. The test measures duration and entitlement, not the payment amount.
-
7.5
Invalidity Benefits
Scores 1 whenA legal benefit entitlement covers long-term or permanent incapacity, after sickness entitlements are exhausted, through a recognised funded scheme.
Key qualificationsSocial insurance, public funding or mandatory regulated pooled arrangements can qualify. Sole employer liability or unregulated arrangements cannot. Benefit adequacy is not scored.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 7. Back to the indicators
-
Equal Opportunity and Treatment
Equal treatment at work, including the legal status of platform workers.
5 components
- Equal Remuneration
- Sexual Harassment in Employment
- Discrimination in Employment
- Access to Same Jobs as Men
- Protection of Platform Workers
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Equal Opportunity and Treatment
Equal Opportunity and Treatment: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
8.1
Equal Remuneration
Scores 1 whenWomen and men are entitled to equal remuneration for work of equal value, including different jobs assessed using objective criteria.
Key qualificationsA rule limited to the same or similar work is insufficient. The protection must bind private employment; public-sector-only coverage or voluntary policies do not qualify.
-
8.2
Sexual Harassment in Employment
Scores 1 whenThe law explicitly prohibits sexual harassment in employment or the world of work, with at least one enforceable remedy or sanction.
Key qualificationsCivil, criminal or administrative routes can qualify. A broader harassment definition must clearly cover sexual conduct. A general dignity rule or protection confined to the public sector is insufficient.
-
8.3
Discrimination in Employment
Scores 1 whenEmployment discrimination is prohibited on at least seven of ten specified grounds, across recruitment, employment terms, advancement or training, and dismissal.
Key qualificationsThe ten grounds are race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction, social origin, age, disability and union membership or activity. Generic constitutional language, or protection only in pay or dismissal, is insufficient unless binding interpretation supplies the required employment coverage.
-
8.4
Access to Same Jobs as Men
Scores 1 whenWomen who are not pregnant or nursing can enter the same jobs, sectors, occupations and night work as men.
Key qualificationsGender-neutral safety rules and temporary, risk-based pregnancy or nursing safeguards may qualify. Blanket sex-based bans or broad government powers to restrict women’s work do not.
-
8.5
Protection of Platform Workers
Scores 1 whenPlatform workers’ employment status is determined by the facts of the relationship rather than the contract label.
Key qualificationsA binding general rule, generally applicable superior-court decision or rebuttable presumption may qualify. Under the presumption, the platform or party asserting non-employment must rebut it. An intermediate status can qualify if fact-based; automatic self-employment or a platform exclusion cannot. This component uses 1 August 2026 as its reference date.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 8. Back to the indicators
-
Child Labour and Forced Labour
Age safeguards and legal protection against forced labour, including remedies.
4 components
- Employment Age
- Compulsory Schooling Age
- Age for Hazardous Work
- Forced Labour
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Child Labour and Forced Labour
Child Labour and Forced Labour: scoring criteria
4 equally weighted components · 25 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
9.1
Employment Age
Scores 1 whenThe general minimum employment age is at least 15, or 14 where the state has formally invoked the developing-country exception.
Key qualificationsThis concerns ordinary, non-hazardous work. Narrow exceptions for light work or specified cultural, artistic or similar activities are separate; broad exceptions or coverage confined to selected sectors do not qualify.
-
9.2
Compulsory Schooling Age
Scores 1 whenThe minimum employment age is at least the age of completing compulsory schooling.
Key qualificationsIf education is defined in grades or years, the normal completion age is calculated from the legal school-entry age. Undefined compulsory schooling, or exceptions permitting regular work before completion, do not qualify.
-
9.3
Age for Hazardous Work
Scores 1 whenHazardous work is prohibited below 18, with hazardous activities identified by law or the competent authority.
Key qualificationsA narrowly defined exception from age 16 can qualify only with full protection of health, safety and morals and adequate specific instruction or vocational training.
-
9.4
Forced Labour
Scores 1 whenForced labour is prohibited in public and private work, with penal sanctions and enforceable remedies, including compensation.
Key qualificationsExceptions must stay within Convention No. 29. The test also bars forced labour for economic mobilisation, labour discipline or punishment for strikes under Convention No. 105. It excludes that convention’s political-coercion and discriminatory-forced-labour provisions. Unresolved legal deficiencies identified by ILO supervisory comments affect the score; weak enforcement alone does not.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 9. Back to the indicators
-
Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
The ability to organise, bargain, strike and participate in social dialogue.
5 components
- Freedom of Association
- Collective Bargaining
- Right to Strike
- Sanctions against Striking Workers
- Social Dialogue
Explore methodologyClose methodology: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining: scoring criteria
5 equally weighted components · 20 points each towards this indicator’s score out of 100. The indicator contributes 10% of the overall score.
-
10.1
Freedom of Association
Scores 1 whenWorkers can form and join unions of their own choosing without prior authorisation, with only the armed forces and police excluded.
Key qualificationsRegistration must be a formality with independent judicial appeal. LRI treats enterprise founding requirements of up to 20 workers or 10% of the workers at the workplace, whichever is less, as reasonable; higher barriers may qualify only if an accessible sectoral, occupational or territorial route exists. State-imposed monopolies, wider worker exclusions and administrative dissolution or suspension defeat the score.
-
10.2
Collective Bargaining
Scores 1 whenIndependent workers’ organisations can bargain voluntarily and conclude legally recognised agreements, under objective and reviewable representation rules.
Key qualificationsAn exclusive majority-selected bargaining agent may qualify, but minority representation and residual bargaining rights must be preserved. Workplace thresholds above 50% fail if no right to bargain for members remains. Compulsory arbitration is limited to jointly agreed cases, strictly essential services, narrowly defined state-administration officials or acute national crises. A rule displacing both bargaining and strikes can reduce both component scores.
-
10.3
Right to Strike
Scores 1 whenWorkers have an effective legal right to strike, with proportionate procedures and narrowly limited restrictions.
Key qualificationsRestrictions may cover armed forces and police, officials exercising state authority, strictly essential services or acute national crises. Permitted bans in essential services or for those officials require impartial, speedy dispute resolution. Minimum services must preserve an effective strike and involve worker organisations. Broad bans, unilateral compulsory arbitration outside the permitted exceptions, excessive ballots or delays, and government power to declare strikes illegal defeat the score. LRI limits prior conciliation to 30 days and notice or cooling-off to 14 days in non-essential services, 20 in public-interest services and 40 in strictly essential services; these are coding rules, not numerical treaty requirements.
-
10.4
Sanctions against Striking Workers
Scores 1 whenWorkers and union representatives are protected against dismissal, retaliation, strike-breaking replacement and penal sanctions for peaceful strike activity, with explicit remedies and prompt, impartial procedures.
Key qualificationsDeducting wages for days not worked is allowed. Temporary staffing for independently determined essential minimum services may qualify. Proportionate consequences for violence, serious misconduct or action independently declared unlawful after due process may be allowed; criminalising peaceful strikes or automatic dismissal on a declaration of unlawfulness fails. Protection must cover ordinary participants as well as union officials.
-
10.5
Social Dialogue
Scores 1 whenA legally or officially recognised, regular process brings government, representative workers’ organisations and employers’ organisations into consultation before relevant decisions.
Key qualificationsOrganisations must choose their own representatives and participate on broadly equal terms; exact seat equality and binding advice are not required. Consultation must cover labour law, policy or international labour standards, not just a narrow technical topic. Ad hoc, government-controlled or after-the-decision consultation does not qualify.
Summary of the methodology, Indicator 10. Back to the indicators
The questions use international labour and human-rights standards, with explicitly defined LRI benchmarks where a comparable coding rule is needed.
How a score is built
The Index uses a common set of rules to make legal protections comparable. Every answer is tied to its legal basis.
- 0 or 1
Answer each question
A component receives 1 when the law meets its benchmark and 0 when it does not. There is no partial credit.
- 0–100
Calculate each indicator
Average the component answers within an indicator and multiply by 100.
- 10
Give each indicator equal weight
Average the ten indicator scores to obtain the overall country score, also on a scale from 0 to 100.
For example: four positive answers out of five
An indicator with four positive answers out of five scores 80 out of 100. This illustrates the calculation; it is not a country result.
Safe Work and Child Labour and Forced Labour have four components each; the other indicators have five. Components carry equal weight within their indicator, and each indicator carries equal weight in the overall score.
Read law and practice separately
A strong score means that the selected legal protections exist for the worker and situation covered by the methodology. It does not measure enforcement, employer compliance or workers’ lived experience.
Know the reference case
The standard case is a skilled worker in formal, full-time private employment on an indefinite contract, with the required service and social-security qualifications. Where labour law varies within a country, the Index uses the most populous first-level jurisdiction.
Keep the reference date in view
National law is generally assessed as it stood on 1 January 2026. The platform-work component uses 1 August 2026. Later developments should be distinguished from the law being scored.
About the Index
A de jure index: it reads the law itself, country by country, against common international standards.
The Labour Rights Index measures whether national labour laws provide selected protections for workers across the employment life cycle. It is co-produced by the WageIndicator Foundation (the Netherlands) and the Centre for Labour Research (Pakistan), which serves as WageIndicator’s Global Labour Law Office.
- years of research
- 15+behind the Index
- team members
- 30+contributed data informing the Index
- ILO Conventions and Protocols
- 45with the UDHR and UN human rights treaties
- ILO Recommendations
- 20+used to interpret binding standards
Grounded in international standards
Each component links to an international labour or human-rights standard. Where no binding standard gives a codeable threshold, it rests on an explicitly labelled LRI coding rule, and the methodology identifies the legal status of every source.
Read from the law itself
WageIndicator’s Global Labour Law Office at the Centre for Labour Research reads the legislation directly: thousands of pages across 168 countries. Scoring is not outsourced to national correspondents or law firms, and no government, employer or trade union body funds or approves the scores.
Checked against other sources
Every component score cites the legal provision it relies on. Scores are cross-checked against the WageIndicator Labour Law Database, ILO supervisory comments and legal databases, and World Bank reports, and country teams can flag missing sources.
A single benchmark for working life
Other indices focus on violations in practice, long time series or the business environment. The Index offers one de jure benchmark of what a country’s laws provide across the whole employment life cycle, using common international standards.
Frequently Asked Questions
A few distinctions help make the Index useful without reading more into a score than it can tell us.
What is the Labour Rights Index?
The Labour Rights Index (LRI) is a comparative, rights-based legal index that measures whether national labour laws provide selected protections for workers across the employment life cycle. It is a de jure index: it looks primarily at laws, regulations and other binding legal instruments, not at whether employers comply with the law in practice.
How frequently are the scores updated?
The Labour Rights Index is updated every two years. The first three editions of the Index were launched in 2020 (115 countries), 2022 (135 countries), and 2024 (145 countries), respectively. The fourth edition of the Index in 2026 takes into account the labour legislation in effect on 1 January 2026 (1 August 2026 for Component 8.5 on Protection of Platform Workers).
Is the Labour Rights Index a human rights index?
Yes, in the specific field of labour rights. The Index is grounded in the idea that labour rights are human rights. Its indicators are linked to international labour standards and human rights instruments, including ILO Conventions and UN human rights treaties. But the Labour Rights Index is not a general human rights index and does not attempt to measure every civil, political, economic, social, or cultural right.
Does a high LRI score mean that all workers enjoy decent work in practice?
No. A high score means that the selected legal protections exist in the law for the benchmark worker and situation covered by the methodology. It does not mean that enforcement is effective, that workers know their rights, or that violations do not occur. Read country scores alongside contextual indicators.
How can Labour Rights Index findings be used?
As indicated elsewhere, the Labour Rights Index is intended primarily for governments and government agencies, trade union federations, employers’ organisations, multilateral institutions and national-level civil society organisations. It is intended as a tool for policymakers and social partners.
Workers can also use country profiles to understand the formal legal protections that apply to the LRI reference case. The headline or the overall score should not, however, be used as the sole basis for an employment, migration or investment decision because it does not measure implementation or individual legal circumstances.
Civil society organisations can use national scores as starting points for dialogue, advocacy and reform proposals. The Labour Rights Index data can also inform human rights due diligence, trade-policy and development discussions. An LRI rating is not, however, a legal certification or an eligibility condition under schemes such as the EU GSP/GSP+ or the United States GSP (currently expired); those regimes have their own legal criteria, monitoring procedures and compliance assessments. The Index data can nevertheless help assess how far national law aligns with the labour requirements of preferential trade schemes.
The Labour Rights Index is also a useful benchmarking tool that can stimulate policy debate by exposing challenges and identifying best practices. The Index provides meaningful input to policy discussions aimed at improving labour market protections at the country level.
The Labour Rights Index is a repository of ‘objective and actionable’ data on labour market regulation, along with best practices that countries worldwide can use to initiate necessary reforms. Labour ministries can also use the comparative data to find the best practices within their own regions and around the world.
How is Labour Rights Index data collected?
The Labour Rights Index team reviews labour codes, employment laws, social security laws, OSH laws, anti-discrimination laws, inspection laws, regulations, official wage orders, and other binding legal instruments. Sources come from official gazettes, government legal portals, ILO databases, WageIndicator country materials, the WageIndicator Labour Law Database, the WageIndicator Minimum Wage Database, and other reliable legal databases.
Why did a country’s score change when its law did not?
Usually one of three reasons: a methodology change (a revised question, benchmark or coding rule); newly located or corrected legal evidence; or correction of an earlier coding error. Each is identified in the country profile, and legislative change is always distinguished from methodological change or score adjustment due to correction. .
Get the report
The 2026 report and country profiles are shared on request. They go well beyond the scores on this page.
What the report adds
- A profile for each of the 168 countriesThe overall score and rating, all ten indicator scores, and how the country compares with its regional average and the highest scorer in its region.
- The legal basis behind every answerThe answer to each of the 48 components, country by country, with the legal provision it rests on.
- Every score change since 2024Each change marked as a legal reform, a rollback, a change in the Index’s rules or a correction from better legal information, not only the seven examples above.
- Context beside the lawInformal employment, trade union density, collective bargaining coverage, social protection coverage and workers per labour inspector, from ILO and World Bank data.
- Analysis beyond the scoresChapters on forced labour, platform work, human rights due diligence and each region, and the methodological revisions for 2026.
What you can do with it
- Governments and labour ministries
- Benchmark national law against the region and find the practice other countries have already legislated.
- Trade unions and employers’ organisations
- Ground negotiations and social dialogue in what the law does and does not yet provide.
- Civil society
- Start dialogue, advocacy and reform proposals from the gaps a country profile shows.
- Businesses and researchers
- Inform human-rights due diligence, trade-policy and comparative work with component-level legal data.
A rating is not a legal certification of compliance, and a score does not measure how well a law is enforced.
How to request it
- Please get in touch through the WageIndicator contact form.
- In the subject line, please mention Labour Rights Index 2026 and whether you would like the report or profiles for particular countries.
- It helps us to know a little about you: your organisation and how you plan to use the Index.
- The detailed report/ country profiles will be released and shared with you starting November 2026.
Earlier editions, including the 2024 report, remain public under Previous editions below.
Press release
The 2026 press release will be published here when the Index launches.
Previous editions
Explore the results, heatmaps and reports published with earlier editions of the Index.


